<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>AcuteAero &#187; Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://acuteaero.com/category/reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://acuteaero.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 17:55:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Don&#8217;t Buy The thesuperkids Shaft Adapter</title>
		<link>http://acuteaero.com/2010/03/12/dont-buy-the-thesuperkids-shaft-adapter/</link>
		<comments>http://acuteaero.com/2010/03/12/dont-buy-the-thesuperkids-shaft-adapter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Electric Poly-V Bike]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acuteaero.com/?p=569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m working on putting together an electric bike using a surplus Kollmorgen &#8220;Hi-Kol&#8221; BLDC motor- more on that later. I&#8217;ve gone back and forth about ways to interface with that stubby short little stepped, D shaped shaft on the Hi-Kol- I had gotten fed up with imagining nasty little systems of bushings and decided it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://acuteaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/DSCN0180.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-570" title="DSCN0180" src="http://acuteaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/DSCN0180.jpg" alt="" width="435" height="326" /></a></p>
<p>I&#8217;m working on putting together an electric bike using a surplus Kollmorgen &#8220;Hi-Kol&#8221; BLDC motor- more on that later. I&#8217;ve gone back and forth about ways to interface with that stubby short little stepped, D shaped shaft on the Hi-Kol- I had gotten fed up with imagining nasty little systems of bushings and decided it was worth the money just to get the premade shaft adapter- $25 after shipping in fact.</p>
<p>Spoiler: it&#8217;s junk. Read more-<span id="more-569"></span></p>
<p><a href="http://acuteaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/DSCN0182.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-571" title="DSCN0182" src="http://acuteaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/DSCN0182.jpg" alt="" width="435" height="326" /></a></p>
<p>And of course- the only thing worse than paying too much for something is paying too much for something that is truly worthless- which the thesuperkids.com kollmorgen shaft adapter is. Worthless. First. No D-shaped bore. The shaft pin transfers all the torque into the adapter. And it&#8217;s shipped with a crappy little roll pin. Second. The bores are about .002&#8243; &#8211; .003&#8243; oversize. On a shaft so short that means that the fit is very loose. Which brings us to problem number three. It doesn&#8217;t run true. The real dealbreaker.</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/93Dy8aCMMRw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/93Dy8aCMMRw&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>And in the usual way of online shopping I spent $25 and would get $9.60 back if I returned it, minus whatever it costs me to ship it back. The Kollmorgen Hi-Kol motor is a really nice little unit and still a good deal (I paid $65) but dealing with that shaft is tricky and this is NOT THE WAY.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acuteaero.com/2010/03/12/dont-buy-the-thesuperkids-shaft-adapter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Impression: 2009 Mercury Grand Marquis</title>
		<link>http://acuteaero.com/2009/03/25/impression-2009-mercury-grand-marquis/</link>
		<comments>http://acuteaero.com/2009/03/25/impression-2009-mercury-grand-marquis/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 04:20:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Henry</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Cars]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://acuteaero.com/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Colorado over the weekend my Dad and I rented a car- since the rental car lot was out of subcompacts, they gave us an automatic &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to a &#8220;premium&#8221; level vehicle- a nearly brand new Grand Marquis. While providing useful transportation all weekend, the Marquis (pronunciation informally decided to be &#8220;mar-kees&#8221;) was also much [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-86" title="dscn0496" src="http://acuteaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/dscn0496.jpg" alt="dscn0496" width="435" height="326" /></p>
<p>In Colorado over the weekend my Dad and I rented a car- since the rental car lot was out of subcompacts, they gave us an automatic &#8220;upgrade&#8221; to a &#8220;premium&#8221; level vehicle- a nearly brand new Grand Marquis. While providing useful transportation all weekend, the Marquis (pronunciation informally decided to be &#8220;mar-kees&#8221;) was also much more interesting than a subcompact could have been. Heck- the Crown Vic is practically american car legend! The car has a significant cachet. It&#8217;s a classic, iconic car.</p>
<p>That all said, it&#8217;s also a piece of trash. I will procede to numerically compare it to my benchmark of internal combustion automotive perfection- the 1994 Toyota Camry Station Wagon LE V6 (AKA Pimp Wagon)</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Area of interest</th>
<th>Camry</th>
<th>Marquis</th>
<th>Marquis W.R.T.* Camry</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cylinders</td>
<td>6</td>
<td>8</td>
<td>33% More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Displacement</td>
<td>3.0L</td>
<td>4.6L</td>
<td>53% More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Horsepower</td>
<td>188</td>
<td>224</td>
<td>19% More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Camshafts</td>
<td>4</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>50% Fewer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Curb Weight</td>
<td>3263 lbs</td>
<td>4117 lbs</td>
<td>26% More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EPA Mileage</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>18</td>
<td>Same</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>KBB Value</td>
<td>$2,860</td>
<td>$28,606</td>
<td>900% More</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>Starting to get the picture? The Marquis sounds like a cop car and rides very comfortably on the road- but I was expecting a whole lot more grunt when you really mash the throttle and get the revs up. Even burying it deep in the carpet, the Camry is much more responsive and pulls harder. The &#8216;quees&#8217;s steering is very light and brakes are firm, suspension is akin to a chinese bean cake- squishy.</p>
<p><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-89" title="dscn0498" src="http://acuteaero.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/dscn0498.jpg" alt="dscn0498" width="435" height="326" /></p>
<p>I was impressed by the Marquis&#8217; lack of interior space, particularly legroom&#8211;</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Area of interest</th>
<th>Camry</th>
<th>Marquis</th>
<th>Marquis W.R.T Camry</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Front Legroom</td>
<td>43.5 in</td>
<td>41.6 in</td>
<td>4.4% Less</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Rear Legroom</td>
<td>34.7 in</td>
<td>38 in</td>
<td>9.4% More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Exterior Width</td>
<td>69.7 in</td>
<td>84.5 in</td>
<td>21% Greater</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Total interior and cargo space</td>
<td>140.8 cu. ft.</td>
<td>128.1 cu. ft</td>
<td>9% Less</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So, the Marquis, despite being a much larger car has less front legroom and less usable space. It&#8217;s also insanely wide. As you can tell, I have a high opinion of the Camry- but let&#8217;s see how the Marquis shines with the really important stuff-</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<th>Area of interest</th>
<th>Camry</th>
<th>Marquis</th>
<th>Marquis W.R.T. Camry</th>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Cadavers Stashable</td>
<td>1 small one</td>
<td>5+ big ones</td>
<td>400% More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Number of rear wipers</td>
<td>2</td>
<td>0</td>
<td>∞% Fewer</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Likelyhood of being</p>
<p>mistaken for cop</td>
<td>Very unlikely</td>
<td>Quite likely</td>
<td>5 Doughnuts More</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Stereo</td>
<td>Bangin&#8217;</td>
<td>Lacking</td>
<td>Are you kidding?</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Likelyhood of being ignored</td>
<td>Very high</td>
<td>Less</td>
<td>Depends</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Americanness</td>
<td>Somewhat</td>
<td>Absolute</td>
<td>Pure Red White and Blue</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>So, the Grand Marquis is a car to respect and enjoy- in its own way it&#8217;s really wonderful. It is a classic, iconic, instantly recognizable vehicle backed with decades of American bench-seat cruiser history. It&#8217;s also a design that seems absolutely stuck in the &#8217;90s. The dashboard is huge and impedes footroom enormously. The front middle seat is cramped and the cupholders and lighter are effectively inaccessible when it is occupied. The built in trip computer falls short of expectations, doesn&#8217;t realize it&#8217;s potential. There are many more modern cars that are much more functional and innovative than the Vic/Marquis available at the price point. Not to mention that you could have a whole fleet of Camry Wagons.</p>
<p>Regardless, no cars have the cachet and iconic status of the big Ford. I respect the car, but I would not want to own one. I am grateful that I got the unexpected chance to get to know the Marquis over the weekend, the experience wouldn&#8217;t have been the same with a Focus or dinky Kia, one of the bland throwaway subcompacts so popular with rentals. The Mercury may be technologically behind, but it&#8217;s not a throwaway piece of crap- I feel grateful to have participated in the American legend that is the Crown Vic.</p>
<p>*(W.R.T. = With Respect To &#8211; have you ever been in a college math class??)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://acuteaero.com/2009/03/25/impression-2009-mercury-grand-marquis/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

